Oblivion:Drones, Salvation, and the Heart of Jesus (and major spoilers)

oblivion-featurette

 

Last week Shalom house invited the Circle of Hope Network to the movies with them.  My cell decided to go too (especially because Dave and Nathan are a part of our cell).  They wanted to see Oblivion because apparently it was all about drones—and you know Shalom House is interested in drones.

The producer/writer/director of the film, Joseph Kosinski, has tried to distance the film from any negative press, by saying that this is just a science fiction film and not an anti-drone commentary.  Making a point is not good business.  Kosinski says that it is just a coincidence that drones are receiving a lot of press around the same time as his movies release:

It is interesting how sometimes the news seems to somehow parallel the entertainment business.  All this stuff in the paper about drones recently is interesting.  I remember seeing a depiction of a drone in The Empire Strikes Back as a kid and it was the most terrifying thing, this notion of a machine with no soul battling on the surface.  That was kind of the inspiration for the fleet of drones in this movie.  Both movies have explored the idea of our relationship with technology, how it can be good, but also how it can be not so good.  It’s just something we need to be wary of.  Technology can do amazing things for us.  It’s something we need to keep an eye on as Jack learns in the movie.”

But we aren’t keeping an eye on it, Joe!  And your movie is!  I wish he wouldn’t belittle the power his movie could have.  Drones are portrayed as indiscriminate, vicious killing machines in Oblivion.  That is a good thing in my opinion.  Drone technology is not exclusively used for murder in our reality but all the good technology seems to be getting coopted for murder.  Those “predator” drones that are blowing up Afghanistan are certainly designed to kill—and cheaply, and without risk.

Risk is at the heart of the point that Kosinski does want to make in Oblivion.  Tom Cruise is forced to take a risk that will almost certainly end in his death.  The refrain that leads up to this momentous decision is a quote from a 19th century English poem:

To every man upon this earth
Death cometh soon or late.
And how can man die better
Than facing fearful odds,
For the ashes of his fathers,
And the temples of his gods?

Thomas Babington Macaulay wrote these words for the mouth of Horatius a hero of Ancient Rome who defended a bridge against the oncoming Etruscan horde.  He knows he is going to die, that is a matter of course for all humanity, but he wants to die well, to preserve that which was handed down to him by his ancestors and to honor his sense of what is holy.

For Tom Cruise, of course, the fate of the entire human race falls upon his shoulders—“ashes of his fathers”—check.  The god of Oblivion is also not surprising—it is love.  The memory of love that transcends what is expected enlivens Tom Cruise’s character’s heart and helps him to escape the mold in which he has been made, literally.  Other symbolism, especially in the final scenes, drive the connection between Tom Cruise and the Savior all the way home, but this post already has too many spoilers.

“Greater love has no one than this, to lay down one’s life for one’s friends” – John 15:13.  Sounds close, right?  Horatius stands in the way of fearful odds for the sake of his people, those whom he loves.  Tom Cruise chooses to make a glorious sacrifice in order to save the one he loves and the rest of the human race with her.  But Jesus lays down his life in a different way.  His sacrifice in and of itself is completely unsuccessful.  If we look at the “scientifically” observable facts, Jesus is a failed revolutionary when he dies on the cross.  His followers are just as much at the mercy of the powers that killed their leader.  Many of them, in fact, die at the hands of the same power.  And yet Jesus laid down his life for us.

There’s more than meets the eye.  Jesus’ success is in a cosmic shift in what success means.  He changed the whole universe by going a way that stretched beyond death.  He died and God raised him from the dead.  He risked it all and lost it all and then something new happened.  His strategy seemingly failed but then the way of the world was proved failing by the new thing that God did.

Drones are attractive to US military and many US citizens because they take “our boys” out of harm’s way.  They help us figure out how to continue to “save the world” and not die.  That is the message of Oblivion.  You can save the world and not die (yes, even Tom Cruise gets resurrected in a way).  The Christian who believes that God’s power is made perfect in weakness recognizes that saving the world is not our job.  It requires a lot of faith to lay down the sword/gun/drone—faith that our government doesn’t have, but that we as Christians ought to speak out from.

In the same interview I quoted above, Joseph Kosinski says:

“I love movies that ask big questions but don’t necessarily answer everything.  I like people walking out thinking about something.  I wanted this to be a movie that people would talk about and debate and argue over and discuss and think about a couple days later.  Hopefully, great science fiction films help you think about issues that relate to yourself, whether it’s:  What’s my purpose?  Why am I here?  What is it that makes me who I am?  Those are the kind of questions my favorite science fiction films ask.  Hopefully, it’s a movie that people walk away with talking about after.”

We’re talking about it.  Let’s make sure our president, senators and representatives hear about it from us.  Drones are more expedient killing machines that grieve the heart of Jesus.  Tell the world, “not in our name.”

Posted in Drones, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Reason Weaponized Drones are a bad idea #23

 

There is so many other things people would rather do with the billions it takes to develop build and deploy weaponized drones.

629c70f0bff111e2967b22000aa80146_7

 

The Reaper drone cost $11.8 billion to develop and $16.9 million to

build each one. The Predator drone cost $2.38 billion to develop and $4.03 million for each one. When considering all the factors – control station, satellite link, fuel, etc. – a single hour of flying a drone costs $2,500 – $3,500.

 

Our Government is going to spend 10 million dollars on building a drone command center in Horsham. This weekend 58 at the Trenton Avenue Arts Festival people wrote their ideas of what they would do with 10 million dollars to help their community.  Not one said a Drone Base. Bel;os is a sampleing of a few:

  • Seed money for new businesses
  • After School programs
  • Grean spaces and more play grounds
  • I will build a homeless shelter
  • Pay for the Reading Viaduct
  • I would put swings in all the city parks
  • Better fresh food access
  • Fund the city schools
  • Build aquaponic Greenhouses
  • More urban farms
  • I would put music and arts programs in schools
  • Lights in Fern Hill
  • Good Drug and Alcohol programs
  • Mix-income housing
  • Affordable housing
  • Free Health care for Everyone

Lots of Great things to do beside build drones and drone command centers!!

 

Posted in Drones | Leave a comment

Why weaponized drones are a bad idea #12:

Why weaponized drones are a bad idea #12:

They produce more terrorists then they kill.

Aren’t sure about this statement? Then watch the testimony of Farea Al-Musimi. He is a youg man who participated in a foreign exchange student program. His village was also attacked by drones. In the video he is testifying at the only congressional hearing that our democratic government has nad on the president’s drone warfare programs.

http://www.democracynow.org/2013/4/24/as_obama_shuns_hearing_yemeni_says

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Shalom House Video

The Shalom House Guidence Team was brainstorming ways to help inform people about  the message that Jesus offers us about peace and how that impacts how we interact with and in the world.  Our friend Nic created a video for us to help tell people what we’re all about.

Are you interested in joining in the mission?  Want to learn more about the types of activities we do and what we gain from them to bring to the peacemaking conversation? New friends are always welcome to come to one of our potluck dinners if you’re local or contact us if you’re out of town to begin a dialogue.
Posted in Circle of Peacemakers, community, Connecting with peacemakers, peace, philadelphia, Shalom House story | Leave a comment

What Are Drones? FAQ and simple answers

Every now and then someone says something like this:

“I’m not sure if drones are really bad or good.
Honestly, I don’t know much about them…”

And really, that’s understandable.  The US’s military use of drones is new (relatively speaking) and organizations like the CIA have tried to keep it hidden from us. But let’s try to be as informed as possible. Let’s talk about drones.

It’s time for some Frequently Asked Questions!
Accessible answers. Just facts – no propaganda.
[Got more questions? Help us make a great FAQ and pass them along.]

So … what’s a drone?

“Drone” is the common word for what is technically a UAV – unmanned aerial vehicle.
Or UAS – unmanned aircraft system – to include the ground crew.
Or RPA – remotely piloted aircraft – to acknowledge a human pilot.
Basically, drones are like tricked out toy airplanes and helicopters that we used to play with as kids (and still want to!). They are machines that are not physically guided by humans, unlike a 747 passenger plane or the car in your driveway.

Are drones bad?

No. Drones are tools. It is a tool for a human to do something from a distance. (Although, even this gets murky. Stay with us.) A hammer is not bad. A swiss army knife has no evil intention. In and of itself, a drone is a tool with an almost unending list of uses. The person/group who uses the tool decides what to do with it.

So what can be done with a drone?

Almost any task you can imagine for a robot. Civilian drones are currently being used for geographical mapping, photography, cinematography, search and rescue, and, yes, police surveillance (remember Christopher Dorner?). Military use of drones include reconnaissance, finding unexploded land mines, and aerial missile strikes.  New applications for drones are a constant effort for R&D labs.

Why are drones controversial?

Again, drones don’t do anything they’re not told to, (as of now; see below) so the controversy is truly with the user.  As mentioned above, drones have some wonderful and life-saving applications. Many people use drones for good. However, many are using drones in explicitly illegal ways – of whom/which the highest profile is our own government.  The President, the US Air Force, and the CIA all use drones. Perhaps the most controversial is the use of drones for targeted killings in Pakistan and Yemen. This is illegal by international law because we are not in a declared state of war with these nations.

How does the US get away with that?

The argument goes that drones are not people. We have no “boots on the ground” so, technically speaking, we have no military presence in these countries … However, if we use the term preferred by the Air Force – RPA – then we have to admit humans are involved, though the boots are still on US soil. Politics…

Another question on drones – what’s the future of drones?

Drones are still a relatively new technology.  Drones are still big, bulky, and cumbersome to control.  But all technology gets smaller, easier, and cheaper with time. The future of drones really isn’t hard to prophesy. First, analyze what people/organizations want to accomplish. Then give that person/organization a remote controlled robot. They’ll use it to whatever end they desire. They’ll also pay R&D labs to make drones customized for their specific needs.

Military wages war: drones will become better killing machines.
Police enforce laws: drones will be equipped with cameras and perhaps tasers.
Construction companies: drones will make buildings to new heights.
Just use your imagination. How could ______ use a drone?
Oil companies? PPA? Fire departments? Movie directors? National Guard? FBI? Dept. of Homeland Security? Census Bureau? Homeless outreach services? Churches?
The possibilities really are astounding.

One scary very-near-future of drones concerns the degree of human control. Currently, every drone is essentially an expensive remote controlled toy. Every move is controlled by the pilot or pre-programmed by the developer. New software is being explored by R&D corporations to make drones fly completely autonomously; not quite Artificial Intelligence but still programmed with algorithms to make decisions. This is intended for military use, since a pilot 3000 miles away may experience lag in the video feed. With an autonomous software, drones will be more effective in direct combat.

On a practical note, last February Obama issued an act that surveillance UAVs are allowed in US airspace. Further, the FAA will allow for civilian use of drones in US airspace starting 2015. By the end of the decade it is expected that an average of 30,000 drones will be flying over the US.
[source]

What is a Christian/Biblical response to drones?

Here, as above, the issue isn’t simply drones. Aside from ascetic interpretations (e.g. monastic, Amish, etc.) the Bible speaks very little about faith and technology.  However, the Bible is very clear about technology in the military. In the Old Testament, it is law that the government should not amass horses and chariots – i.e. a standing army (e.g. Duet. 17). King David gets in huge trouble when he takes a military census during a time of peace (2 Sam. 24). A large standing army is listed under “Solomon’s Splendor” (1 Kings 10). Prophets continually speak out against reliance on the military (e.g. Isaiah 2:6-9). And that’s the point; a grand military, stocked with the latest technology, does not rely on God’s saving power – a dramatic theme throughout the Bible.

Consider Gideon’s story (Judges 6-8). Gideon brought 32,000 troops against his enemy, Midian. Then … The LORD said to Gideon, “You have too many men. I cannot deliver Midian into their hands, or Israel would boast against me, ‘My own strength has saved me.’” (7:2) God cuts the army of 32,000 soldiers down to a squad of 300 inexperienced fighters, sending the excess men back to their homes. After the astonishing victory, Gideon gives credit where credit is due: The Israelites said to Gideon, “Rule over us—you, your son and your grandson—because you have saved us from the hand of Midian.” But Gideon told them, “I will not rule over you, nor will my son rule over you. The LORD will rule over you.” (8:22-23) Gideon recognized that Israel’s salvation – even in war! – depended on God’s power, not military might.

So our response to drones, as people of faith, is not to depend on them for military advances and national security. And further, as people dedicated to Christ – the exemplar of nonviolence and the one we must emulate – we cannot depend on any weapon. The person with the greatest reason for self-protection (being also God!) said “put away your sword” and let himself be murdered by both the ruling authorities and the occupying enemy empire. (John 18:1-14)

Hopefully this FAQ has helped. For discussion, or to add more questions, please comment below.

Posted in Drones, military, nonviolence, Pakistan, Uncategorized, war | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments